Legal barriers and reflections on the use of assisted reproductive technology by single women in China

Shenjie Gao, Guanhe Liu

Abstract

This study analyzed the legal obstacles on the access to assisted reproductive technology (ART) by single women in mainland China, focusing on the period from 2001 to 2024, and reassessed the Chinese regulatory framework. The study employed legal text data sourced from the PKU Law database, and the case data from the China Judgments Online. Results revealed that the Chinese prevailing legislative framework prohibits single women to use ART and the courts oppose egg freezing for this group too, which creating regulatory obstacles to their reproductive rights. The study finds that the traditional concept of marriage, in which fertility is linked to marriage, and the long-standing family planning policy are at the root of China’s ban on single women using ART. Prohibition-type provisions in China are challenging to adapt to changing socio-economic and technological environments and public attitudes, and should be updated to reflect global practices and legislation..

Full Text:

PDF

References

Jin GZ and Zhai ZW. Premarital childbearing of women in

China and its impacts on first marriage. Population Journal 2023; 45(2): 1-14.

Egan J. Wanted: a few good sperm (looking for Mr. Good

Sperm). The New York Times Magazine 2006; 44

Genadek K, Sanders J, and Stevenson A. Measuring US

fertility using administrative data from the Census

Bureau. Demographic Research 2022; 47: 37-58.

Chen JJ and Jin YA. Historical and future trajectories of

world fertility: trends comparison and pattern

summary. Population Journal 2021;43(6):41-53.

Zhu RC, Peng L, and Liu JX. Reflections and suggestions on

legal ethics of single women’s fertility in China.

Chinese Medical Ethics 2024; 37(7): 791-797.

China Single Women’s Reproductive Rights Concern Group.

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Childbearing

among

Single

Women.

https://cnlgbtdata.com/files/uploads/2019/05/%E6%

%B0%E6%8D%AE%E7%89%88%E5%85%AC

%E4%BC%97%E5%AF%B9%E5%8D%95%E8%

BA%AB%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E6%80%81

%E5%BA%A6%E7%9A%84%E8%B0%83%E6%

F%A5%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf, accessed

on 18 May 2025.

Shi JY and Zeng J. Single women’s use of Assisted Human

Reproductive Technology: evidence and paths to

realization. Applying the Law 2022; (9): 3-12.

PKULaw,

https://www.pkulaw.com/law?way=topGuid,

accessed on 13 July 2025.

Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family

Planning, Notice on Improving the Quality Control

of Human Assisted Reproductive Technology

Service Programs in the City, September 2013,

https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/fybj2/20180815/0012

html, accessed on 18 May 2025.

China Single Women’s Reproductive Rights Concern

Group. “Single” Women’s Reproductive Rights - A

Research Report on Policy and Lived Experience.

https://max.book118.com/html/2019/0101/6242112

shtm, accessed on 18 May 2025.

Varlas VN, Bors RG, Albu D, Penes ON, Nasui BA,

Mehedintu C and Pop AL. Social freezing: pressing

pause on fertility. International journal of

environmental research and public health 2021;

(15): 8088.

Chaoyang District People’s Court, Beijing. Xu and a

Hospital General Personality Right Dispute Case.

Minchu, Civil Judgement, No.86861.

Kaifu District People’s Court, Changsha, Hunan Province.

Minchu, Civil Judgment, No.799.

Li TY, Zheng L, Zheng JJ and Chen Q. Obstacles to

Exercising Reproductive Rights for Single Women

in China and Legal Recommendations. Risk

Management and Healthcare Policy 2023; 2125

Widowed woman wins case for IVF, single women loose

fertility.

https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=173621089000299

&wfr=spider&for=pc, accessed on 18 May

Article 53 of the 1978 China’s Constitution states, “The

State advocates and promotes family planning.”

Article 25 of the 1982 China’s Constitution states,

“Family planning is practiced in order to achieve

population growth consistent with economic and

social development plans.”

New Beijing News. Member Peng Jing Suggests: Give

Single Women the Right to Perform Assisted

Reproductive

Technology.

https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2020/05

/9189536.shtml, accessed on 18 May 2025.

News Morning Post. National People’s Congress Deputy

Huang Xiaohua Suggests Guaranteeing Single

Women’s

Reproductive

Rights.

https://news.sina.com.cn/c/2022-03-02/doc

imcwipih6195784.shtml, accessed on 18 May 2025.

National

Health

Commission.

Response

to

Recommendation No.3395 of the Fifth Session of the

Twelfth

National

People’s

Congress.

http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/jiany/201712/8a24174d

c6942c65052ce5.shtml, accessed on 18

May 2025.

Why Single Women May Not Freeze Their Eggs? The

National Health Commission Gives Answer, at

https://www.toutiao.com/article/6932714921423700

/?source=seo_tt_juhe, , accessed on 18 May

Petropanagos A. Reproductive “Choice” and Egg Freezing.

In Oncofertility Cancer Treatment and Research,

edited by Woodruff T, Zoloth L, Campo-Engelstein

L, Rodriguez S. Boston MA: Springer, 2010, 223-35.

Delvigne A. Symposium: Update on prediction and

management of OHSS. Epidemiology of OHSS.

Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2009; 19(1): 8-13.

De Sutter P, Gerris J and Dhont M. Assisted reproductive

technologies: how to minimise the risks and

complications in developing countries? ESHRE

Monographs 2008; (1): 73-6.

Wang J and Lu Y. The technical rationality and bioethical

dilemma of social egg freezing Technology. Studies

in Dialectics of Nature 2021; 37(08): 81-6.

Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N and Mitchell H.

Reproductive technology and the life course: current

debates and research in social egg freezing. Human

Fertility 2014; 17(3): 170-9.

Jones BP, Saso S, Mania A, Smith JR, Serhal P and Ben

Nagi J. The dawn of a new ice age: social egg

freezing. Acta Obstetricia Scandinavica 2018; 97(6): 641-7. et Gynecologica

Goold I and Savulescu J. In favour of freezing eggs for non

medical reasons. Bioethics 2009; 23(1): 47-58.

Liu GH. Measurement of opportunity: the rationality

defense of social egg freezing. Journal of

Northeastern University (Social Science) 2024;

(01):8-16.

Hou XB and Yan H. Substantive autonomy: the theoretical

logic of the rights-based approach to social egg

freezing. Jianghan Tribune 2022; (09):128-136.

Zhang JC. On the right basis and realization path of single

women’s right to freeze eggs. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)

; 26(03):101-10.

Cobo A, Serra V, Garrido N, Olmo I, Pellicer A and Remohí

J. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born

from vitrified oocytes. Fertility and sterility 2014;

(4): 1006-15.

Robertson J. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New

Reproductive Technologies. Princeton University

Press, 1994.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 1, “All

human beings are born free and equal in dignity and

rights.”

https://www.ohchr.org/en/human

rights/universal-declaration/translations/english,

accessed on 18 May 2025.

Convention on the Elimination of all forms of

Discrimination

Against

Women.Article

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments

mechanisms/instruments/convention-elimination

all-forms-discrimination-against-women, accessed

on 18 May 2025.

Tehran, 1968: International Conference on Human Rights.

The right of human beings to determine the number

and spacing of their offspring, as well as to have

access to education and information about them, was

first proclaimed. mainz.de/articles/ridderhttps://hhr-atlas.ieg

tehran#:~:text=In%20April%20and%20May%2019

%2C%20representatives%20of%2084,first%20U

nited%20Nations%E2%80%99%20International%2

Conference%20on%20Human%20Rights,

accessed on 18 May 2025.

Yu Y. Single Women’s Reproductive Rights. Master’s

Thesis, Jilin University, 2014.Human Reproductive

Technology Ordinance of Hong Kong, China, Cap.

https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap561!sc?xpid

=ID_1438403449997_001, accessed on 18 May

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.