Marital experience and challenges of women with disabilities in Saudi Arabia: A phenomenological study

Yasir A. Alsamiri, Ayesha Alnemah Alaghdaf, Basheer A. Allouash, Ibraheem M. Alsawalem, Seham D. Alfaidi, Malik A. Hussain

Abstract

Women with disabilities, like all women, deserve equal opportunities for marriage. However, their experiences within marriage remain unclear, making it difficult to effectively address the issue. This qualitative study aims to explore the marriage experiences of women with disabilities in Saudi Arabia. The study utilized a developed semi-structured interview to collect data from eight participants registered with a private association in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data analysis followed the six-step Braun and Clarke (2006) model. The study found that some women with disabilities have positive marriage experiences, but they also face societal negativity regarding their right to marry. Additionally, the support from families and partners is often insufficient. Legal and financial challenges also hinder marital stability. The research area is extremely important due to its impact on the physical and psychological health of women with disabilities, as well as on society. The article concludes by discussing implications for practices and future research.

Full Text:

PDF

References

United Nations. (2024). Article 23 - respect for home and the

family | United Nations enable. www.un.org.

https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/co

nvention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with

disabilities/article-23-respect-for-home-and-the

family.html

Satvat A, Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A, Falsafinejad MR and

Sanagoo A. Identifying the challenges marriage of

person with physical-motor disabilities in Tehran: A phenomenological study. Iranian Journal of

Rehabilitation Research 2019; 5(2): 55–62.

https://ijrn.ir/browse.php?a_id=355&sid=1&slc_lan

g=en

Farrugia D. An exploration of the perceptions of mothers and

their daughters with intellectual disability on forming

relationships, marriage and parenting. In:

www.um.edu.mt.

https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/12345678

/52566 (Master`s thesis, University of Malta), 2019

Horner-Johnson W, Darney BG, Kulkarni-Rajasekhara S,

Quigley BM and Caughey AB. Pregnancy among US

women: Differences by presence, type, and

complexity of disability. American Journal of

Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016; 214(4): 529.e1

e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.929

Jalal S and Gabel S. Physical disability, gender, and marriage

in Jordanian society. 2014; 10 (1&2).

https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/ef140a

a-1b19-4756-9886-5a1a8fbd62c4

Jones D, Webster L, Smith F, Doyle N, Martin T and Andyka

V. In: A handbook on mainstreaming disability.

www.

https://asksource.info/pdf/33903_vsomainstreaming

disability_2006.pdf

Al-Khareef RBM and Al-Qahtani MBS. Density in the

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Types, characteristics and

spatial variation. Journal of Gulf and Arabian

Peninsula Studies 2020; 46 (176).

https://search.mandumah.com/Record/1061445.

Alsawalem I and Algraigray H. Analytical study. Journal of

Special Education and Rehabilitation 2022; 14(51):

-143. Retrieved from

http://search.mandumah.com/Record/1353969

MacInnes MD. Altar-Bound? The effect of disability on the

hazard of entry into a first marriage. International

Journal of Sociology 2011; 41(1): 87–103.

https://doi.org/10.2753/ijs0020-7659410105

Moin V, Duvdevany I and Mazor D. Sexual identity, body

image and life satisfaction among women with and

without physical disability. Sexuality and Disability

; 27(2): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195

-9112-5

Parker G. Disability, caring and marriage: The experience

of younger couples when a partner is disabled after

marriage. The British Journal of Social Work 1993; 23(6): 565-580.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a056009

Amin AS, Shaari AH and Khairuddin KF. Barriers to

marriage and motherhood: The experiences of

disabled women in Malaysia. The History of the

Family 2019; 25(2): 246–264.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602x.2019.1663548

Clawson R and Fyson R. Forced marriage of people with

learning disabilities: A human rights issue. Disability

& Society 2017; 32(6): 810–830.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1320271

Rauf B, Saleem N, Clawson R, Sanghera M and Marston G.

Forced marriage: Implications for mental health and

intellectual disability services. Advances in

Psychiatric Treatment 2013; 19(2): 135–143.

https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.111.009316

Zhang J. (2004). Survey of the needs of and services for

persons with physical disability in China. Norway:

University of Oslo.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30824094.pdf

Mehrotra N. Women and disability management in rural

Haryana, India. Asia Pacific disability rehabilitation

journal 2008; 19(1): 38-49.

Elkhateeb I and Peter D. Negation of the right of women

with disabilities in Palestine to marry: Cultural

considerations for disability. Sexuality and Disability

; 37(4): 559–570.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09588-1

Al Rub MOA and Al Ahmed FASA. Problems that women

with disabilities encounter compared to non–disabled

ones in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Life Science

Journal 2014; 11(7): 778-788.

Abedi A, Rostami M, Abedi S, Sudmand N and Movallali

G. Marital satisfaction in deaf couples: A review

study. Auditory and Vestibular Research 2018; 27(4):

-184. https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v27i4.122

Alamri GS. (2022). Factors affecting deaf marriage from

their point of view in the Saudi society. Zarqa Journal

for Research and Studies in Humanities, 22 (3) 480

Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in

psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology

; 3(2): 77–101.

https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.