Key Informant Views of a Free Delivery and Caesarean Policy in Senegal

Sophie Witter(1), Mohamed Diadhiou(2),


(1) 
(2) 
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article presents the findings of one component of an evaluation of the national policy for free deliveries and caesareans in Senegal. The policy was introduced in 2005 in five more deprived regions of the country. It aimed to reduce the financial barriers to using maternity services and to increase the number of facility-based deliveries. The findings are drawn from 54 semi-structured interviews with key informants who had technical and administrative or political responsibility for the policy at national, regional, district and health post level. These were carried out from November 2006 to January 2007. The evaluation findings emphasise the importance of careful planning and communication before a major national policy is implemented, and also of simple and clear definition of the package of ‘free’ services on offer. Long term investment in supply will also be needed to increase access for the most remote areas (Afr J Reprod Health 2008; 12[3]:93-112).

 

RĖSUMĖ

Les vues d’informateur clef d’un accouchement gratuit d’une politique césarienne au Sénégal Cet article présente des constatations d’un composant d’une évaluation de la politique nationale sur les accouchements gratuits et césariens au Sénégal. La politique a été introduite en 2005 dans cinq régions défavorisées du pays. Il a comme but de réduire les barrières financières d’utiliser les services maternels et d’augmenter le nombre d’accouchements à l’aide des installations. Les conclusions sont tirées de 54 interviews demi-structurées avec des informateurs clefs ayant des responsabilités techniques, administratives ou politiques pour la politique au niveau national, régional, au quartier et au poste sanitaire. L’étude a été entreprise du novembre 2006 au janvier 2007. Les conclusions évaluées soulignent l’importance du planning soigneux et la communication avant l’application d’une politique national majeure ainsi que de la simple définition claire de la présentation des services ‘gratuits’ en demande. L’investissement en offre à terme long sera important pour augmenter l’accès pour des régions isolées (Afr J Reprod Health 2008; 12[3]:93-112).

 

 Deliveries, Caesareans, Fee exemption, Senegal, Key Informants 

KEY WORDS: Senegal 


References


UN. UN Millenium Development Goals. 2005.

Hill K, Thomas K, AbouZahr C, Walker N, Say L, Inoue M, et al. Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data. The Lancet 2007;370:1311-9.

Kunst A, Houweling T. A global picture of poorrich differences in the utilisation of delivery care. In: De Brouwere V, Van Leberghe W, editors. Safe motherhood strategies: a review of the evidence. 2001.

Gwatkin D, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, Amouzou A. Socioeconomic differences in health, nutrition and population in developing countries: an overview. Washington, D.C.: World Bank; 2007.

Sharma S, et al. Maternal health user fees in five countries: the relationship between formal and informal fees as components of total costs of maternal health services. 2005. Report No.: Paper for American Public Health Association.

Dmytraczenko T, Aitken I, Carrasco S, Capra Seonane K, Holley J, Abramson W, et al.

Evaluation of the national security scheme for

mothers and children in Bolivia. Bethesda, en soins obstetricaux et neonatals d'urgence. Maryland: Abt Associates for PHR; 1998. 2006.

Barker C, Bird C, Pradhan A, Shakya G. Support 12. MoH. Enquete demographique et de Santé:

to the Safe Motherhood Programme in Nepal: an Senegal. Dakar: Ministere de la Santé et de la integrated approach. Reproductive Health Prevention Medicale; 2005.

Matters 2007;15(30):81-90. 13. Witter S, Mbengue D. Financial analysis of the

Penfold S, Harrison E, Bell J, Fitzmaurice A. free delivery and caesarean policy in Senegal. Evaluation of the delivery-fee-exemption policy Aberdeen & Dakar: Immpact & CEFOREP; in Ghana: population estimates of changes in 2007.

delivery service utilisation in two regions. Ghana 14. Witter S, Arhinful D, Kusi A, Zakariah-Akoto S.

Medical Journal 2007;41(3):100-9. The experience of Ghana in implementing a user

Borghi J, Ensor T, Somanthan A, Lissner C, fee exemption policy to provide free delivery Mills A. Mobilising financial resources for care. Reproductive Health Matters 2007; maternal health. Lancet 2006;10.1016/S0140- 15(30):1-11.

(06)69383-5. 15. MSPM et al. Evaluation des strategies de

Hygea, Acodess. Carte sanitaire du Senegal. reduction des barrieres economiques,

Dakar: Ministere de la Santé; 2005. socioculturelles, sanitaires et institutionelles a

Diadhou M, et al. Delegation des competences l'acces aux soins obstetricaux et neonataux au Senegal. Dakar: MSPM, FUNUAP, Immpact,

CEFOREP; 2007.

Tornui J, Armar-Klemesu M, Arhinful D, Penfold S, Hussein J. Hospital based maternity

care in Ghana: findings of a confidential enquiry

into maternal deaths. Ghana Medical Journal

;41(3):125-32.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 453 times
PDF Download : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.