Effects of decision-making in pregnancy via the internet on self-care agency and prenatal attachment
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Kahraman A and Özbaşaran F. Virtual support, real
nourishment: the role of social media in
breastfeeding practice. Çekmece Journal of Social
Sciences
doi: 10.55483/cekmece.1346548 2024;11(23): 92-103.
TSI, DA. Household information technologies (IT) usage
survey. 2022.
https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/index?p=Hanehalki
Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi
-45587
Al-Dahshan A, Chehab M, Mohamed A, Al-Kubaisi N and
Selim N. Pattern of internet use for pregnancy
related information and its predictors among women
visiting primary healthcare in Qatar: A cross
sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;
:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884021042270
Serçekuş P, Değirmenciler B and Özkan S. Internet use by
pregnant women seeking childbirth information. J
Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 50(8): 102144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102144
Bjelke M, Martinsson AK, Lendahls L and Oscarsson M.
Internet as a source of information during pregnancy - A descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden.
Midwifery 2021; 40: 187-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.020
Baker B and Yang I. Social media as social support in pregnancy and the postpartum. Sex Reprod Healthc
;
:
–4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.003
Baltacı N, Kaya N and Kılıçkaya İ. Investigation of E-Health
Literacy and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors of
Pregnant Women. STED 2023; 32(4): 301-13. DOI:
17942/sted.1229364
Çelik AS and Derya YA. Determining the Self-Care Agency
and the Health Practice Levels of the Pregnant
Women and the Effective Factors. GUJHS 2019;
(1):
-19.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/682093
Dereli SY, Kızılkaya S and Beji N. Turkish Version of
Prenatal Attachment Inventory: A Study of
Reliability and Validity. Journal of Anatolia Nursing
and Health Sciences 2013; 16(2): 103-09.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/29648
Aksoy EY, Dereli SY and Aslantekin F. Prenatal
attachment and social support in risk pregnancies.
Turkiye Klinikleri J Health 2016;1(3):163-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2016-50668
Koyun A and Erbektaş G. Development of “decısıon
makıng scale vıa ınternet on pregnancy” JACSD
;
:
-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17367/JACSD.2018.1.6
Yılmaz S and Beji NK. Turkish Version of Prenatal
Attachment Inventory: A Study of Reliability and
Validity. Anadolu Journal of Nursing and Health
Sciences
;
(2):
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/29648
-09.
Nahcivan ÖN. Validity and reliability study: adaptation of
the self-care agency scale to Turkish. West. J. Nurs.
Res1994;
:
1177/0193945904267599
-19.
DOI:
Ahmadian L, Khajouei R, Kamali S and Mirzaee M. Use of
the Internet by pregnant women to seek information
about pregnancy and childbirth. Inform Health Soc
Care
; 45(4):
-95.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1769106
Jacobs EJ, Van Steijn, ME and Van Pampus MG. Internet
usage of women attempting pregnancy and pregnant
women in the Netherlands. Sex Reprod Healthc
; 21:
-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2019.04.005
Conrad M. Health information-seeking internet behaviours
among pregnant women: a narrative literature
review. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2024; 42(2): 194
https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2022.2088711
Sayakhot P and Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant
women seeking pregnancy-related information: a
systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;
: 1-10. DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-0856-5
Nie P, Peng X and Luo T. Internet use and fertility behavior
among reproductive-age women in China. China
Econ Rev 2023; 77: 101903.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101903
Hussain IM, Hartney, N. & Sweet LA survey of Australian
women’s digital media usage in pregnancy and
labour and birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 688
(2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06003-8
Rahman M, Yamaji N, Nagamatsu Y, Ota E Effects of
mHealth Interventions on Improving Antenatal Care
Visits and Skilled Delivery Care in Low- and
Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and
Meta-analysi J Med Internet Res 2022;24(4):e34061
URL: https://www.jmir.org/2022/4/e34061 DOI:
2196/34061
Lagan BM, Sinclair M and George Kernohan W. Internet
use in pregnancy informs women’s decision making:
a web‐based survey. Birth 2010; 37(2):106-15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x
Grimes HA, Forster DA and Newton MS. Sources of
information used by women during pregnancy to
meet their information needs. Midwifery 2014;
(1): 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.007
Özcan H, Şahan Ö, Gunay M and Şimşek H. Self-care
agency in pregnancy. Clin Exp Health Sci
DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.780534 2024; 12(4): 787-92.
Özdemir F, Öztürk A, Karabulutlu Ö and Tezel A.
Determination of the life quality and self-care ability
of the mothers in post-partum period. J Pak Med
Assoc 2018; 68(2): 210-5.
Khazaeian S, Khazaeian S and Fathnezhad-Kazemi A.
Association between awareness, perceived severity,
and behavioral control of COVID-19 with self-care
and anxiety in pregnancy: A cross-sectional
study. Women Health
; 62(1): 55-67.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2021.2014020
Yılmaz SD and Beji NK. Evaluation of self care agency in
pregnancy. J. Gen. Med 2010; 20(4).
https://acikerisim.selcuk.edu.tr/items/ab5e3011
be-49c0-81c2-3fa01f13ac0f
Kapısız SG, Var EÇ and Duyan V. Relation Between the
Characteristics of the Mother, The Gestation and The
Prenatal Attachment. TJFMPC 2020; 14(4): 651-56.
DOI: 10.21763/tjfmpc.739981
Branjerdporn G, Meredith P, Wilson T and Strong J.
Prenatal predictors of maternal-infant
attachment. Can J Occup Ther 2020; 87(4); 265-77.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417420941781
Bernad BC, Mitrache D, Hogea L, Pașcalău A, Gavreliuc
A, Craina M and Bernad E. Impact of the mother's
mental health and socioeconomic status on prenatal
attachment in a population-based sample of
expectant romanian women. Clin Exp Obstet
Gynecol 2024; 51(3): DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog5103059
Elkin N. Levels of prenatal attachment in pregnant women
and factors affecting ıt. STED 2015; 24: 230-36.
Sade G and Özkan H. The correlatıon between life
satisfaction and prenatal attachment levels of
pregnant women. Journal of General Medıcıne 2020;
(4): 255-62. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/2156554
Dikmen HA and Çankaya S. Effects of maternal obesıty on
prenatal attachment. AUHSJ 2018; 2: 118-23.
https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2018.1
Coşkun AM, Okcu G and Arslan S. The impact of distress
experienced during pregnancy on prenatal
attachment. Perınatal
; 27(2):
-55.
https://www.perinataldergi.com/Files/Archive/Cove
rs/en-US/PJ-27-259.pdf#page=74
Canlı A and Demirtaş B. Prenatal attachment and the
relationship with body self-perception. J Obstet
Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2022; 51(1): e1-e12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.09.003
Smith M, Mitchell AS, Townsend ML and Herbert JS. The
relationship between digital media use during
pregnancy, maternal psychological wellbeing, and
maternal-fetal attachment. PLoS One 2020; 15(12):
e0243898.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243898
Eltomy EH, Essa RM and Fathalla NF. Relationship
between Maternal Fetal Attachment and Self-Care
Practices among Pregnant Women. ASNJ 2020;
(2):19-26.
https://journals.ekb.eg/article_206110_27e147762af
ce3857a0a847831591a.pdf
Abiç A, Aksoy A and Yılmaz DV. The relationship
between pregnant women’s prenatal attachment
levels
and
health
pregnancy. JGEHES
practices
; 4(1):
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/1984053
during
-8.
Nguyen LD, Nguyen LH, Ninh LT, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen
AD, Vu LG and Ho RC. Women’s holistic self-care
behaviors during pregnancy and associations with
psychological well-being: implications for maternal
care
facilities. BMC
Pregnancy
Childbirth
; 22(1): 631. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884
-04961-z
Lee Y, Kim S and Choi S. Effectiveness of mobile-based
intervention Self-care for Pregnant Women at Work:
A randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health 2023;
(1): e12402. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348
12402
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.