The role of digital health in early detection and treatment of pre eclampsia in the prenatal period at primary healthcare facilities, South Africa: Pregnant women’s perspective

Mxolisi W. Ngwenya, Livhuwani Muthelo, Tebogo M. Mothiba, Masenyani O. Mbombi

Abstract

An average of 76 000 maternal deaths and 500 000 neonatal deaths are reported globally yearly as a result of pre-eclampsia. To deal with this major concern, digital health initiatives are being increasingly used especially in maternal health, as it shows potential to improve the maternal health gap in reaching and achieving the Sustainable Development goals targets 3.1 and 3.2. Surprisingly, little is known about its use and role in early detection and treatment of pre-eclampsia among women in their prenatal period in a South African context. Therefore, this poses an inquiry of “What role digital health might possible play in early detection and treatment of pre-eclampsia?” Thus, this study intends to explore the digital health use in early detection and treatment of pre eclampsia by pregnant women at primary healthcare facilities. A qualitative exploratory and descriptive design were used for the understanding of participants’ knowledge and barriers to digital health utilization. The study adopted a purposive sampling method to select participants for interviews and data saturation was reached with the 10th participant. Data was collected using semi structured interviews and was analyzed using an open Tesch’s coding. Data quality was enhanced by applying four elements recommended by Lincoln and Guba. The study revealed that there’s knowledge inconsistencies on digital health use among women with pre-eclampsia. Despite the knowledge inconsistencies factors such as poor socio-economic status, lack of trust and validation of digital health initiatives, and poor network connectivity prevented the women in using digital health effectively. Nonetheless the study also revealed that families, friends and midwives play an imperative role as a source of support and knowledge on early detection and treatment of pre-eclampsia. Therefore, the study recommends that measures to ensure enhanced access to digital health information should be adopted. Moreover, more efforts should be made towards improving the accessibility of the digital health; this includes provision of infrastructure.

Full Text:

PDF

References

English FA, Kenny LC, and McCarthy FP. Risk factors and

effective management of preeclampsia. Integrated

blood pressure control. 2015 Mar 3:7-12.

Hong T, Meng X, Gao X, and Wang J. Choroidal vascular

sublayers in Chinese pre-eclampsia and healthy

pregnancy. 2019

Poon LC, Magee LA, Verlohren S, Shennan A, von

Dadelszen P, Sheiner E, Hadar E, Visser G, Da Silva

Costa F, Kapur A, and McAuliffe F. A literature

review and best practice advice for second and third

trimester

risk

stratification,

monitoring, and

management of pre‐eclampsia: Compiled by the

Pregnancy and Non‐Communicable Diseases

Committee of FIGO (the International Federation of

Gynecology and Obstetrics). International Journal of

Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021 Jul;154:3-1.

Vata PK, Chauhan NM, Nallathambi A, and Hussein F.

Assessment of prevalence of preeclampsia from Dilla

region of Ethiopia. BMC research notes. 2015

Dec;8(1):1-6.

Arnaert A, Ponzoni N, Debe Z, Meda MM, Nana NG, and

Arnaert S. Experiences of women receiving mhealth

supported antenatal care in the village from

community health workers in rural Burkina Faso,

Africa.

Digital

Nov;5:2055207619892756.

health.

Asi YM, and Williams C. The role of digital health in making

progress toward Sustainable Development Goal

(SDG)

in

conflict-affected

populations.

International journal of medical informatics. 2018 Jun

;114:114-20.

Tehrani N. How advances in digital health benefit pregnant

women. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol. 2017 Apr

;6(4):8-10.

Tambo E, Madjou G, Mbous Y, Olalubi OA, Yah C, Adedeji

AA, and Ngogang JY. Digital health implications in

health systems in Africa. Eur J Pharm Med Res.

;3(1):91-3.

Van Pelt S, Massar K, Shields-Zeeman L, De Wit JB, Van der

Eem L, Lughata AS, and Ruiter RA. The development

of an electronic clinical decision and support system

to improve the quality of antenatal care in rural

Tanzania: lessons learned using intervention mapping.

Frontiers in Public Health. 2021 May 20;9:645521.

Holst C, Sukums F, Radovanovic D, Ngowi B, Noll J, and

Winkler AS. Sub-Saharan Africa—the new breeding

ground for global digital health. The Lancet Digital

Health. 2020 Apr 1;2(4):e160-2.

Tanzania’s Health Baby SMS service records 1M mHealth

Registrations.

Available

at

https:hitconsultant.net/2015/10/13/ Tanzania’s Health

Baby SMS service records 1M mHealth Registrations.

Feroz A, Jabeen R, and Saleem S. Using mobile phones to

improve community health workers performance in

low-and-middle-income countries. BMC Public

Health. 2020 Dec;20:1-6.

Pillay Y, and Motsoaledi PA. Digital health in South Africa:

innovating to improve health. BMJ global health.

Apr 1;3(Suppl 2):e000722.

Plano Clark VL, and Creswell JW. Understanding research:

A consumer’s guide. Pearson; 2015.

Dorrington R. Alternative South African mid-year estimates,

Cape Town: Centre for Actuarial Research,

University of Cape Town; 2013 Nov.

Department of Health. Available at Department of Health

(mpuhealth.gov.za). Accessed in July 2023.

Municipalities of South Africa, 2021). Available at Local

government

|

South

African

Government

(www.gov.za). accessed March 2021

Brink H, and Van der Walt C. Fundamentals of research

methodology for health care professionals. Juta and

Company Ltd; 2012

Etikan I, and Bala K. Sampling and sampling methods.

Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal. 2017

May;5(6):00149.

Mgolozeli SE, and Duma SE. “They destroyed my life

because I do not feel like a man anymore”: An

Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Men's

lived experiences of rape victimization. Heliyon. 2020

May 1;6(5).

Boddy CR. Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative

Market Research: An International Journal. 2016 Sep

;19(4):426-32.

Polit DF, and Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and

assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott

Williams & Wilkins; 2021

De Vos AS, Delport CS, Fouche C, and Strydom H.

Research at grass roots: A primer for the social science

and human professions. Van Schaik Publishers; 2011.

WHO. Quality of care for maternal, newborn, child and

adolescent health. Accessed at Maternal, Newborn,

Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing Department

(who.int). 2020

Wirthman, L. How Technology Is Closing The Gap In

Maternal Healthcare. Accessed at How Technology Is

Closing The Gap In Maternal Healthcare

(forbes.com). 2019

Ronquillo Y, Meyers A, and Korvek SJ. Digital health. 2017

Weingarten E, Chen Q, McAdams M, Yi J, Hepler J, and

Albarracín D. From primed concepts to action: A

meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally

presented words. Psychological bulletin. 2016

May;142(5):472.

Burke A, Nahin RL, and Stussman BJ. Limited health

knowledge as a reason for non-use of four common

complementary health practices. PloS one. 2015 Jun

;10(6):e0129336.

World Health Organization. Primary healthcare on the road

to universal health coverage: 2019 global monitoring

report. 2021

Ahmed T, Rizvi SJ, Rasheed S, Iqbal M, Bhuiya A, Standing

H, Bloom G, and Waldman L. Digital health and

inequalities in access to health services in Bangladesh:

mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

Jul 21;8(7):e16473.

Were MC. Challenges in digital medicine applications in

under-resourced settings. 2020

Olu O, Muneene D, Bataringaya JE, Nahimana MR, Ba H,

Turgeon Y, Karamagi HC, and Dovlo D. How can

digital health technologies contribute to sustainable

attainment of universal health coverage in Africa? A

perspective. Frontiers in public health. 2019 Nov

;7:341.

Goggin G. New ideas for digital affordability: Is a paradigm

shift possible?. Journal of Telecommunications and

the Digital Economy. 2014 Jun;2(2):4-1.

Reiners F, Sturm J, Bouw LJ, and Wouters EJ.

Sociodemographic factors influencing the use of

eHealth in people with chronic diseases. International

journal of environmental research and public health.

Feb;16(4):645.

Watkins JO, Goudge J, Gómez-Olivé FX, and Griffiths F.

Mobile phone use among patients and health workers

to enhance primary healthcare: A qualitative study in

rural South Africa. Social Science & Medicine. 2018

Feb 1;198:139-47.

Kaihlanen AM, Virtanen L, Buchert U, Safarov N, Valkonen

P, Hietapakka L, Hörhammer I, Kujala S, Kouvonen

A, and Heponiemi T. Towards digital health equity-a

qualitative study of the challenges experienced by

vulnerable groups in using digital health services in

the COVID-19 era. BMC health services research.

Feb 12;22(1):188.

Caballero-Uribe CV. An education in digital health. Digital

Health: Scaling Healthcare to the World. 2018:329

Samrc. Prioritising research and evaluation for digital health

in South Africa_July 2019.pdf (samrc.ac.za). 2019

Philippe TJ, Sikder N, Jackson A, Koblanski ME, Liow E,

Pilarinos A, and Vasarhelyi K. Digital health

interventions for delivery of mental health care:

systematic and comprehensive meta-review. JMIR

mental health. 2022 May 12;9(5):e35159.

Busse TS, Nitsche J, Kernebeck S, Jux C, Weitz J, Ehlers JP,

and Bork U. Approaches to improvement of digital

health literacy (eHL) in the context of person-centered

care. International Journal of Environmental Research

and Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.