Transforming reproductive healthcare in rural China: The impact of mobile health, telemedicine, and e-health innovations on family planning and maternal health services

Xiangzhuo Wang, Hamza Iftikhar, Umelaila Shah, Uzair Hashmi, Muhammad S. Iqbal

Abstract

This study systematically examines the impact of digital health solutions on reproductive healthcare in rural China employing a mixed-method approach, including qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and rural patients, analysis of government pilot projects, and review of digital healthcare policies. The methodology combines field interviews, policy research, and project data evaluation to provide a comprehensive picture of how mobile health, telemedicine, and electronic health are being implemented and experienced in the reproductive healthcare system of rural China. The findings indicate that mobile apps for reproductive health education, appointment scheduling, and remote consultations have improved timely access to family planning information and maternal care. The results of this study underline the importance of critical innovations that are beginning to be implemented in rural healthcare in China and the difficulties that must be resolved if scalable long-term success is to be obtained. The study concludes with policy recommendations to strengthen digital health integration in rural regions, enhance training programmes for healthcare providers, and foster public-private partnerships to expand digital services.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmed A, Siddiqi AR, Tahir MJ and Shaikh BT. Policy

discourse and reform in the healthcare system of

Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2021; 21(1):1–10.

Chen J, Amaize A and Barath D. Evaluating telehealth

adoption and related barriers among hospitals located

in rural and urban areas. J Rural Health 2022;

(1):132–41.

Shaeen SK, Tharwani ZH, Bilal W, Islam Z and Younus MZ.

Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Telemedicine

for Enhanced Healthcare Delivery in Pakistan. Int J

Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(18):11820.

Cui F, Ma Q, He X, Zhai Y, Zhao J, Chen B and et al.

Artificial intelligence and telemedicine in the fight against COVID-19: A narrative review. J Med

Internet Res 2020; 22(8):e19623.

Du Y, Zhou Q, Cheng W, Zhang Z, Hou J, Sun C and et al.

Role of telemedicine in healthcare during the

COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive narrative

review. J Telemed Telecare 2022; 28(5):356–64.

Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K and

Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting

telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J

Telemed Telecare 2018; 24(1):4–12.

Monaghesh E and Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during

COVID-19 outbreak: A systematic review based on

current evidence. BMC Public Health. 2020;

(1):1193.

Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of

human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019;

(1):44–56.

Ohannessian R and Duong TA and Odone A. Global

Telemedicine Implementation and Integration

Within Health Systems to Fight the COVID-19

Pandemic: A Call to Action. JMIR Public Health

Surveill 2020; 6(2):e18810.

Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R and Cheema S.

Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic:

Scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(12):

e24087.

Gilson L. Health policy and systems research: a

methodology reader. Geneva: Alliance for Health

Policy and Systems Research, World Health

Organization; 2012.

Mills A. Health policy and systems research: defining the

terrain; identifying the methods. Health Policy Plan

; 27(1):1–7.

World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.

From innovation to implementation: eHealth in the

WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO

Regional Office for Europe; 2016.

Sheikh K, George A and Gilson L. People-centred science:

strengthening the practice of health policy and

systems research. Health Res Policy Syst 2014;

(1):1–6.

Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design

and Methods. 6th ed. Sage publications, 2017.

Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in

psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2):77–101.

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE and Moules NJ. Thematic

analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.

Int J Qual Methods 2017; 16(1):1–13.

Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P and

Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service

organizations:

systematic

review

and

recommendations. Milbank Q 2004; 82(4): 581–629.

Sheikh K, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, Hanson K, Ssengooba

F and Bennett S. Building the field of health policy

and systems research: framing the questions. PLoS

Med 2011; 8(8):e1001073.

Gopalan SS and Das A. Household economic impact of

non-communicable diseases in India. Health Policy

Plan 2017;32(2):176–87.

World Health Organization. A health telematics policy in

support of WHO's Health-for-all strategy for global

health development. Report of the WHO Group

Consultation on Health Telematics. Geneva: WHO,

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Evaluating

Clinical

Applications

Telemedicine:

of

Telemedicine.

A Guide to Assessing

Telecommunications in Health Care. Washington

(DC): National Academies Press (US), 1996.

Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N and Loukanova S.

Systematic review on what works, what does not

work and why of implementation of mobile health

(mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health.

; 14(1):188.

Roine R, Ohinmaa A and Hailey D. Assessing

telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature.

CMAJ. 2001;165(6):765–71.

Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Krupinski EA and Grigsby J.

Sustaining and realizing the promise of telemedicine.

Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(5):339–45.

Kayyali B, Knott D and Van Kuiken S, The big-data

revolution in US health care: Accelerating value and

innovation. McKinsey & Company; 2013.

Mechael P, Batavia H, Kaonga N, Searle S, Kwan A,

Goldberger A and et al. Barriers and gaps affecting

mHealth in low and middle-income countries: Policy

white paper. Center for Global Health and Economic

Development Earth Institute, Columbia University,

UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the

Pacific (ESCAP). Harnessing the Potential of Digital

Technologies for Social Protection in Asia and the

Pacific. Bangkok: ESCAP, 2020.

UNCTAD. Digital Economy Report 2021: Cross-border

data flows and development. United Nations, 2021.

United Nations. E-Government Survey 2020: Digital

Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable

Development. New York: UN, 2020.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.