Phubbing and human reproduction: The silent saboteur of intimacy and evolution

Namratha S., Arulchelvan S.

Abstract

Phubbing—phone snubbing—disrupts human intimacy by reducing face-to-face attention, emotional closeness, sexual desire, and reproductive intent. This study examines how persistent phubbing weakens partner communication, bonding behaviors, and relationship satisfaction, potentially contributing to declining reproduction rates. Drawing on behavioral psychology and evolutionary theory, we surveyed 300 adults in committed relationships using standardized measures of relationship satisfaction, emotional closeness, sexual activity, and perceived partner phubbing. Although direct biochemical analysis was not possible, oxytocin-related effects were inferred from bonding indicators like affectionate gestures and eye contact. Qualitative interviews enriched these findings. Results reveal strong negative correlations between phubbing and emotional closeness (r = -0.61), sexual activity (r = -0.48), and relationship satisfaction (r = -0.65). Participants reporting high partner phubbing were three times more likely to express disinterest in having children. Interviews highlighted themes of emotional distance and relational fatigue, with phones described as “invisible walls” obstructing intimacy. These findings suggest that phubbing erodes the emotional foundation of relationships, indirectly reducing reproductive motivation. Understanding phubbing’s impact is crucial as technology increasingly shapes human interaction and demographic trends.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Heitmayer M and Lahlou S. Why are smartphones disruptive?

An empirical study of smartphone use in real-life

contexts. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021 Mar

;116:106637.

Al-Saggaf Y. The psychology of phubbing. Springer; 2022

Oct 29.

Yam FC. The relationship between partner phubbing and life

satisfaction: The mediating role of relationship

satisfaction and perceived romantic relationship

quality. Psychological Reports. 2023 Feb;126(1):303

Beukeboom CJ and Pollmann M. Partner phubbing: Why

using your phone during interactions with your partner

can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in

Human Behavior. 2021 Nov 1;124:106932.

Bröning S and Wartberg L. Attached to your smartphone? A

dyadic perspective on perceived partner phubbing and

attachment in long-term couple relationships.

Computers in Human Behavior. 2022 Jan

;126:106996.

D’amelio PB, Covas R, Ferreira AC, Fortuna R, Silva LR,

Theron F, Rybak F and Doutrelant C. Benefits of pair

bond duration on reproduction in a lifelong

monogamous cooperative passerine. The American

Naturalist. 2024 May 1;203(5):576-89.

Oti T, Satoh K, Uta D, Nagafuchi J, Tateishi S, Ueda R,

Takanami K, Young LJ, Galione A, Morris JF and

Sakamoto T. Oxytocin influences male sexual activity

via non-synaptic axonal release in the spinal cord.

Current Biology. 2021 Jan 11;31(1):103-14.

Roth TS, Samara I, Tan J, Prochazkova E and Kret ME. A

comparative

framework

of

inter-individual

coordination and pair-bonding. Current opinion in

behavioral sciences. 2021 Jun 1;39:98-105.

Ligon-Tucker SE. Together Alone: The Effects of Phubbing

in a Romantic Partnership.

Roberts JA and David ME. Partner phubbing and

relationship satisfaction through the lens of social

allergy theory. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022 Sep 1;195:111676.

Balta S, Emirtekin E, Kircaburun K and Griffiths MD.

Neuroticism, trait fear of missing out, and phubbing:

The mediating role of state fear of missing out and

problematic Instagram use. International Journal of

Mental Health and Addiction. 2020 Jun;18:628-39.

Kearney MS, Levine PB and Pardue L. The puzzle of falling

US birth rates since the Great Recession. Journal of

Economic Perspectives. 2022 Feb 1;36(1):151-76.

Maldonado-Chaparro AA, Forstmeier W and Farine DR.

Relationship quality underpins pair bond formation

and subsequent reproductive performance. Animal

Behaviour. 2021 Dec 1;182:43-58.

Hashemzadeh M, Shariati M, Mohammad Nazari A and

Keramat A. Childbearing intention and its associated

factors: A systematic review. Nursing open. 2021

Sep;8(5):2354-68.

Burkhanova FB and Baimurzina GR. Influence of the spouse

on

reproductive

Ekonomicheskie

;15(2):190-204.

attitudes

i

and

Sotsialnye

motives.

Peremeny.

Abeele MV. The social consequences of phubbing. The

Oxford handbook of mobile communication and

society. 2020 Apr 6:158-74.

Ivankova NV, Anderson JL, Herbey II, Roussel LA and Kim

D.

Realizing Methodological Potentials and

Advantages of Mixed Methods Research Design for

Knowledge Translation. Mixed Methods Research

Design. 2023:496.

David ME and Roberts JA. Developing and testing a scale

designed

to

measure

perceived

phubbing.

International journal of environmental research and

public health. 2020 Nov;17(21):8152.

Hendrick SS, Dicke A and Hendrick C. The relationship

assessment scale. Journal of social and personal

relationships. 1998 Feb;15(1):137-42.

Jones AC, Jones RL and Morris N. Development and

validation of the couple communication satisfaction

scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2018

Oct 20;46(5):505-24.

McDaniel BT and Coyne SM. “Technoference”: The

interference of technology in couple relationships and

implications for women’s personal and relational

well-being. Psychology of popular media culture.

Jan;5(1):85.

Cebollero-Salinas A, Cano-Escoriaza J and Orejudo S.

Impact of online emotions and netiquette on phubbing

from a gender perspective: educational challenges.

Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research.

Jan;11(1):64-78

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.