Awareness and attitudes of pregnant women regarding endocrine disruptors

Mukaddes T. Miral, Elif KoÇ

Abstract

This study aims assessment of the level of knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women regarding endocrine disruptors. This crosssectional, descriptive study was carried out in the antenatal clinic of a hospital in Istanbul between January 25, 2023, and March 3, 2023. The study sample consisted of 350 pregnant women. The data collection tools were a Personal Data Form, an Endocrine Disruptors Awareness Test, and an Endocrine Disruptors Attitude Scale. The rate of women reporting that they received no education on endocrine disruptors is 99.7%. The average score for the Endocrine Disruptors Awareness Test was 9.15±3.19, and for the Endocrine Disruptors Attitude Scale was 73.26±8.51. There was a moderate positive correlation between the scores of the Endocrine Disruptors Awareness Test and the Endocrine Disruptors Attitude Scale (r= .52, p< .01). In conclusion, it is believed that pregnant women may be aware of toxic substances in their environment but may not recognise them as endocrine disruptors. It is recommended that the topic of endocrine disruptors be added to antenatal education.

Full Text:

PDF

References

World Health Organization. Global assessment of the state-ofthe-science of endocrine disruptors, 2002. Available

from:

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-PSCEDC-02.2

Jeong GH and Kim HK. Pro‐environmental health behaviour

and educational needs among pregnant women: A

cross‐sectional survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing.

;76(7):1638-1646.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14346

Tang ZR, Xu XL, Deng SL, Lian, ZX and Yu K. Oestrogenic

endocrine disruptors in the placenta and the fetus.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

;21(4):1519.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041519

Hassan S, Thacharodi A, Priya A, Meenatchi R, Hegde TA,

Thangamani R, Nguyen HT and Pugazhendhi A.

Endocrine disruptors: Unravelling the link between

chemical exposure and women's reproductive

health. Environmental Research.

;241:117385.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.20

117385

Monneret C. What is an endocrine disruptor? Comptes Rendus

Biologies. 2017;340:403-405.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2017.07.004

Duursen M, Boberg J, Christiansen S, Connolly L,

Damdimopoulou P, Filis P, Fowler PA, Gadella BM,

Holte J, J‰‰ger K, Johansson HKL, Li T, MazaudGuittot S, Parent A-S, Salumets A, Soto AM, Svingen

T, Velthut-Meikas A, Wedebye EB, Xie Y and van

den Berg M. Safeguarding female reproductive health

against endocrine disrupting chemicals - The FREIA

Project. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

;21(9):3215.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093215

Rouillon S, El Ouazzani H, Hardouin JB, Enjalbert L,

Rabouan S, Migeot V and Albouy-Llaty M. How to

educate pregnant women about endocrine disruptors?

International Journal of Environmental Research

and Public Health. 2020;17(6):2156.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062156

Piazza MJ and Urbanetz AA. Environmental toxins and the

impact of other endocrine disrupting chemicals in

women's reproductive health. JBRA Assisted

Reproduction. 2019;23:154-164. doi: 10.5935/1518-

20190016

Caserta D, Pegoraro S, Mallozzi M, Di Benedetto L, Colicino

E, Lionetto L and Simmaco M. Maternal exposure to

endocrine disruptors and placental transmission: A

pilot study. Gynecological Endocrinology.

;34(11):1001-1004.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1473362

Street ME, Angelini S, Bernasconi S, Burgio E, Cassio A,

Catellani C, Cirillo F, Deodati A, Fabbrizi E, Fanos

V, Gargano G, Grossi E, Iughetti L, Lazzeroni P,

Mantovani A, Migliore L, Palanza P, Panzica G,

Papini AM, Parmigiani S, Predieri B, Sartori C,

Tridenti G and Amarri S. Current knowledge on

endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCS) from animal

biology to humans, from pregnancy to adulthood:

highlights from a national italian meeting.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences,

;19(6):1647.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061647

Zlatnik MG. Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals and

reproductive health. Journal of Midwifery &

Women's Health. 2016;261(4):442-

https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12500

Predieri B, Alves CA and Iughetti L. New insights on the

effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on

children. Jornal de Pediatria. 2022;98:73-85.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2021.11.003

Marie C, LÈmery D, Vendittelli F and Sauvant-Rochat MP.

Perception of environmental risks and health

promotion attitudes of French perinatal health

professionals. International Journal of

Environmental Research and Public Health,

;13(12):

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121255

Turan Miral M, Mamuk R, Dişsiz M and İşgüven ŞP.

Endocrine disruptors attitude scale: A scale

development study. Archives of Health Science and

Research. 2024; Published online November 8.

https://doi.org/10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2024.2410

Tabachnick B and Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th

ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc. 2013.

Kelly M, Connolly L and Dean M. Public awareness and risk

perceptions of endocrine disrupting chemicals: A

qualitative study. International Journal of

Environmental Research and Public

Health, 2020;17(21):7778.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217778

Rouillon S, Deshayes-Morgand C, Enjalbert L, Rabouan S,

Hardouin JB, Migeot V and Albouy-Llaty M.

Endocrine disruptors and pregnancy: Knowledge,

attitudes and prevention behaviors of French

women. International Journal of Environmental

Research and Public Health. 2017;14(9):1021.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091021

Küçükoğlu S, Köse S, Aytekin ÖA and Uruç S.

Determination of knowledge and attitudes of mothers

on additives food. Journal of Inonu University Health

Services Vocational School. 2019;7(2):125-136. doi:

33715/inonusaglik.561151

Bolışık B, Yılmaz HB, Yavuz B and B¸y¸k ET. Analysis of

the factors affecting toy preference for children of

adults. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health

Sciences, 2014;3(4):976-990.

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/articlefile/220121

Ashley JM, Hodgson A, Sharma S and Nisker J. Pregnant

women’s navigation of information on everyday

household chemicals: Phthalates as a case

study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15:1-

doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0748-0

Chung C, Park J, Song JE and Park S. Determinants of

protective behaviors against endocrine disruptors in

young Korean women. Asian Nursing Research.

;14(3):165-172.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.07.002

Moore HE and Boldero J. Designing interventions that last: A

classification of environmental behaviors in relation

to the activities, costs and effort involved for adoption

and maintenance. Frontiers in Psychology.

;8:1874.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01874

Che SR, Barrett ES, Velez M, Conn K, Heinert S and Qiu X.

Using the health belief model to illustrate factors that

influence risk assessment during pregnancy and

implications for prenatal education about endocrine

disruptors. Policy Futures in

Education. 2014;12(7):961-974.

Slomian J, Emonts P, Vigneron L, Acconcia A, Glowacz F,

Reginster JY and BruyËre O. Identifying maternal

needs following childbirth: A qualitative study

among mothers, fathers and professionals. BMC

Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):113.

https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12884-017-1398-1

Akkaş MB and Ege E. Investigation of healthy

lifestyle behaviours of primiparous and multiparous

pregnants: A comparative study. Hacettepe

University Faculty of Health Sciences.

;10(2):358-368. doi: 10.21020/husbfd.1082464

Ergin S÷ and G¸zel A. The evaluation of women knowledge,

attitude and behaviours related with food and kitchen

hygiene. Gümüşhane University Journal Of Health

Sciences, 2018;7(3):11-22.

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gumussagbil/issue/39

/407572

Kavlak O, Atan ŞÜ, Güleç D, Öztürk R and Atay N. Pregnant

women's use of the internet in relation to their

pregnancy in Izmir, Turkey. Informatics for Health

and Social Care. 2012;37(4):253-263.

https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2012.710686

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.