1. Home
  2. Vol 27, No 9 (2023)
  3. Baloyi

Perceptions of midwifery students and their lecturers regarding challenges faced by deaf pregnant women in accessing maternity care

Olivia B. Baloyi(1), Fiona AL Walters(2), Mary Ann Jarvis(3),


(1) School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
(2) School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
(3) School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Midwives are central to caring for pregnant women in labour, including Deaf women. It is the midwife's responsibility to communicate and establish a relationship with the pregnant woman in labour, despite the accompanying challenges. Explore fourthyear undergraduate Midwifery Students' and their Lecturers’ perceptions of the challenges faced by Deaf pregnant women in accessing maternity health care when in labour. A qualitative content analysis approach with purposive sampling allowed for the invitation of Midwifery lecturers (n=2) and Bachelor of Nursing Degree Midwifery students (n=25). Data were collected through four focus group discussions and two individual interviews. Data analysis was guided by Elo and Kyngäs approach and trustworthiness was achieved. Two categories with four subcategories emerged. All pregnant women, inclusive of the often “inaudible” Deaf pregnant woman, are entitled to equitable, accessible, available person-centred maternal health care. (Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27 [9]: 43-56).

References


WHO. D/deafness and hearing loss. 2019; Available from:

https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/D/deafness-and- hearing-loss. .

Statistics South Africa. Profile of persons with disabilities in

South Africa. Report No. 03-01-59. 2011; Available

from:

https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-

-59/Report-03-01-592011.pdf. .

Nketsia W, Mprah WK, Opoku MP, Juventus D and

Amponteng M. Achieving universal reproductive

health coverage for deaf women in Ghana: an

explanatory study of knowledge of contraceptive

methods, pregnancy and safe abortion practices.

BMC Health Services Research, 2022. 22(1): p. 954

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08323-5.

National Department of Social Development. White paper on

the rights of persons with disabilities. 2016;

Available from:

https://www.gov.za/documents/white-paper-rightspersons-disabilities-official-publication-andgazetting-white-paper.

Ahumuza SE, Matovu JK, Ddamulira JB and Muhanguzi

FK. Challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive

health services by people with physical disabilities in

Kampala, Uganda. Reproductive Health, 2014. 11(1):

p. 59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-59.

United Nations Committee on Economic and Social Rights.

International covenant on economic, social and

cultural rights. 1966; Available from:

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instrumentsmechanisms/instruments/international-covenanteconomic-social-and-cultural-rights.

Sporek P. Improving the experience of pregnancy and

childbirth for deaf people and their families. Pract

Midwife, 2014. 17(4): p. 12-4.

Laur A. Healthcare access for deaf patients - The legal and

ethical perspectives. Med Leg J, 2018. 86(1): p. 36-

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817217743416.

Gichane MW, Heap M, Fontes M and London L. "They

must understand we are people": Pregnancy and

maternity service use among signing Deaf women in

Cape Town. Disabil Health J, 2017. 10(3): p. 434-

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.03.016.

Turkmani S, Currie S, Mungia J, Assefi N, Rahmanzai AJ,

Azfar P and Bartlett L. ‘Midwives are the backbone

of our health system’: Lessons from Afghanistan to

guide expansion of midwifery in challenging settings.

Midwifery, 2013. 29(10): p. 1166-1172 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.015.

Jackson M. Deafness and antenatal care: Understanding

issues with access. British Journal of Midwifery,

19(5): p. 280-284 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.5.280.

South African Nursing Council. Nursing Act 33 of 2005.

; Available from:

https://www.gov.za/documents/nursing-act.

Adigun OT and Mngomezulu TP. ‘They Forget I’m Deaf’:

Exploring the Experience and Perception of Deaf

Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics/Care.

Annals of Global Health, 2020. 86(1): p. 10 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2942.

WHO. Universal health coverage (UHC). 2021; Available

from: https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/universal-health-coverage-(uhc).

Kuenburg A, Fellinger P and Fellinger J. Health Care

Access Among Deaf People. The Journal of Deaf

Studies and Deaf Education, 2015. 21(1): p. 1-10

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env042.

Andrissi L, Felice P, Alessandro G, Filiberto MS, Stefano

A, Herbert V, Silvia V, Nunziata C and Vittoradolfo

T. The Influence of Doctor-Patient and MidwifePatient Relationship in Quality Care Perception of

Italian Pregnant Women: An Exploratory Study.

PLOS ONE, 2015. 10(4): p. e0124353 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124353.

Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH and Mutha S. Do

Professional Interpreters Improve Clinical Care for

Patients with Limited English Proficiency? A

Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Services

Research, 2007. 42(2): p. 727-754 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x.

WHO. Nursing and Midwifery. 2018; Available from:

https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/nursing-and-midwifery.

Crotty M. The foundations of social research : meaning and

perspective in the research process. 1998, London ;:

Sage Publications.

Scotland J. Exploring the Philosophical Underpinnings of

Research: Relating Ontology and Epistemology to

the Methodology and Methods of the Scientific,

Interpretive, and Critical Research Paradigms.

English Language Teaching, 2012. 5(9): p. 9-16 DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9.

Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, and de Lacey S. Qualitative

research methods: when to use them and how to judge

them. Human Reproduction, 2016. 31(3): p. 498-501

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334.

Busetto L, Wick W and Gumbinger C. How to use and

assess qualitative research methods. Neurological

research and practice, 2020. 2: p. 14 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.

Mthembu S, Mtshali N and Frantz J. Contextual

determinants for community-based learningprogrammes in nursing education in South Africa :

part 1 : contemporary issues in nursing. South African

Journal of Higher Education, 2014. 28(6): p. 1795-

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/28-6-426.

SANC, Act 33 of 2005. 2005.

Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N

and Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for

qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed

method implementation research. Administration and

Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services

Research, 2015. 42(5): p. 533-544 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

de Waal PJ. The Protection of Personal Information Act

(Popia) and the Promotion of Access to Information

Act (Paia): It Is Time to Take Note. Current Allergy

& Clinical Immunology, 2022. 35(4): p. 232-236.

Nyumba T, Wilson K, Derrick CJ and Mukherjee N. The

use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights

from two decades of application in conservation.

Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2018. 9(1): p. 20-

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860.

Rutledge PB and Hogg JLC. In-Depth Interviews, in The

International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.

p. 1-7.

Kamberelis G and Dimitriadis G. Focus Groups: Strategic

Articulations of Pedagogy, Politics, and Inquiry, in

The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed.

, Sage Publications Ltd: Thousand Oaks, CA. p.

-907.

Elo S and Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis

process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2008. 62(1):

p. 107-115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-

2007.04569.x.

Erlingsson C and Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing

content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med, 2017. 7(3): p. 93-

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001.

Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in

qualitative research projects. Education for

Information, 2004. 22: p. 63-75 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.

Tong A, Sainsbury P and Craig J. Consolidated criteria for

reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item

checklist for interviews and focus groups.

International Journal for Quality in Health Care,

19(6): p. 349-357 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

Stahl NA and King JR. Expanding Approaches for

Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness

in Qualitative Research. Journal of Developmental

Education, 2020. 44(1): p. 26-28.

Forero R, Nahidi S, De Costa J, Mohsin M, Fitzgerald G,

Gibson N, McCarthy S and Aboagye-Sarfo P.

Application of four-dimension criteria to assess

rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine.

BMC health services research, 2018. 18(1): p. 120

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2.

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE and Moules NJ. Thematic

Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness

Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative

Methods, 2017. 16(1): p. 1-1 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

Korstjens I and Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to

qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and

publishing. The European journal of general

practice, 2018. 24(1): p. 120-124 DOI:

1080/13814788.2017.1375092.

Connelly LM. Understanding Research. Trustworthiness in

Qualitative Research. MEDSURG Nursing, 2016.

(6): p. 435-436.

Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J,

Bartlam B, Burroughs H and Jinks C. Saturation in

qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization

and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 2018.

(4): p. 1893-1907 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.

Staunton C, Adams R, Anderson D, Croxton T, Kamuya D,

Munene M and Swanepoel C. Protection of Personal

Information Act 2013 and data protection for health

research in South Africa. International Data Privacy

Law, 2020. 10(2): p. 160-179 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz024.

Lulé D, Kübler A and Ludolph AC. Ethical Principles in

Patient-Centered Medical Care to Support Quality of

Life in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Frontiers in

Neurology, 2019. 10 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00259.

Sugiura L, Wiles R and Pope C. Ethical challenges in online

research: Public/private perceptions. Research

Ethics, 2017. 13(3-4): p. 184-199 DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720.

Signore C, Davis M, Tingen CM and Cernich AN. The

Intersection of Disability and Pregnancy: Risks for

Maternal Morbidity and Mortality. Journal of

Women's Health, 2020. 30(2): p. 147-153 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8864.

de Souza MFNS, Araújo AMB, Sandes LFF, Freitas DA,

Soares WD, Vianna RSDM and Sousa ÁADD. Main

difficulties and obstacles faced by the deaf

community in health access: an integrative literature

review. Principais dificuldades e obstáculos

enfrentados pela comunidade surda no acesso à

saúde: uma revisão integrativa de literatura., 2017.

(3): p. 395-405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-

Orrie S and Motsohi T. Challenges experienced by

healthcare workers in managing patients with hearing

impairment at a primary health care setting : a

descriptive case study. South African Family

Practice, 2018. 60(6): p. 207-211 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2018.1507566.

De Andrade Costa A, Vogt SE, Ruas EDFG, Holzmann

APF and da Silva PLN. Welcome and listen to the

silence: nursing care from the perspective of deaf

woman during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum.

Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam, 2018. 10: p. 7 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2018.v10i1.123-

Haricharan HJ, Heap M, Coomans F and London L. Can we

talk about the right to healthcare without language? A

critique of key international human rights law,

drawing on the experiences of a Deaf woman in Cape

Town, South Africa. Disability & Society, 2013. 28(1): p. 54-66 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.699277.

Pereira PCA and de Carvalho Fortes PA. Communication

and Information Barriers to Health Assistance for

Deaf Patients. American Annals of the Deaf, 2010.

(1): p. 31-37 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0128.

Olson AM and Swabe L. Communication Access for Deaf

People in Healthcare Settings: Understanding the

Work of American Sign Language Interpreters. The

Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), 2017. 39(4):

p. 191-199 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000038.

Arulogun OS, Titiloye TM and Desmenu A. Barriers faced

by service providers in meeting the sexual and

reproductive health needs of deaf persons in Ibadan

metropolis: a qualitative study. J Med Med Sci, 2013.

(11): p. 5 DOI:

http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/jmms.2013.146.

Senne T. Deaf women’s lived experiences of their

constitutional rights in South Africa. Agenda, 2016.

(1): p. 65-75 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2016.1198613.

Masuku KP, Moroe N and van der Merwe D. 'The world is

not only for hearing people - It's for all people': The

experiences of women who are deaf or hard of

hearing in accessing healthcare services in

Johannesburg, South Africa. African Journal of

Disability (Online), 2021. 10: p. 1-8 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v10i0.800.

Schniedewind E, Lindsay R and Snow S. Ask and ye shall

not receive: Interpreter-related access barriers

reported by Deaf users of American sign language.

Disability and Health Journal, 2020. 13(4): p.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100932.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 942 times
PDF Download : 212 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.