Health Providers’ Perception towards Safe Abortion Service at Selected Health Facilities in Addis Ababa
Abstract
In Ethiopia, unsafe abortion accounts up to 32% of maternal deaths. The perception of health providers towards safe abortion provision at selected health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia was assessed. A stratified random sampling was used to select 431 health providers. A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 25-April15, 2008 using a structured self-administered questionnaire. The results were interpreted using descriptive statistics and odds ratios. A majority of the health providers (96.4%) recognized that unsafe abortion was a serious health problem. Providers who had safe abortion practice were 2.57(95% CI 1.49-4.44) times more likely to have favorable attitude towards safe abortion than those without practice. Similarly, providers who knew the law governing abortion were 1.77 (95% CI 1.12-2.78) times more likely to have this favorable attitude than those who lack this knowledge. In conclusion, training of health providers on safe abortion and reproductive rights are essential to reduce maternal mortality (Afr J Reprod Health 2011; 15[1]: 31-36).
Résumé
Perception des dispensateurs de soins médicaux envers les services de l’avortement sans danger au sein des établissements de santé sélectionnés, à Addis Abéba. En Ethiopie, l’avortement dangereux est responsable de jusqu’à 32% de décès maternels. La perception des dispensateurs de soins médicaux envers l’assurance de l’avortement sans danger aux établissements choisis, à Addis Abéba, Ethiopie a été évaluée. On s’est servi d’un échantillon randomisé et stratifié pour sélectionner 431 dispensateurs. Une étude transversale a été menée du 25 mars au 15 avril 2008 à l’aide d’un questionnaire structuré et auto-administré. Les résultats ont été interprétés à l’aide des données statistiques et des proportions fractionnées. Une majorité des dispensateurs de soins médicaux (96,4%) ont reconnu que l’avortement dangereux est un problème de santé important. Les dispensateurs qui avaient des pratiques d’avortement sans danger avaient 2,57(95%CI 1, 49-4,44) fois plus la possibilité d’avoir une attitude favorable envers l’avortement sans danger que ceux qui n’ont pas de pratiques. De la même manière, les dispensateurs qui connaissaient la loi qui régit l’avortement avaient 1,77(95% CI 1,12-2,78) fois la possibilité d’avoir cette attitude favorable que ceux qui ne connaissent pas cette loi. En conclusion, il est nécessaire de former les dispensateurs en matière de l’avortement sans danger et sur les droits de la reproduction pour réduire la mortalité maternelle (Afr J Reprod Health 2011; 15[1]: 31-36).
Keywords: Addis Ababa; Perception of abortion; Safe abortion
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Care for post abortion complications: women’s lives at risk, 1997;Population Reports (The Johns Hopkins School of
Public Health) 25 (1). Available electronically:
http://info.k4health.org/pr/110/110chap1.shtm1#top
Mesce, D and Sines E. Unsafe Abortion Facts and Figures. Population Reference Bureau, 2006. Available electronically: http://www.prb.org/pdf06/UnsafeAbortio n2006.pdf
WHO, unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality 2000.4thed, Geneva, 2004.
Henry P. David, Abortion in Europe, 1920-91: A Public Health Perspective Studies in Family Planning, 1992; 23 (1):1-22.
Dabash R,Pena M, Kolaycz R, Carino G, Mejia M, Winikoff B, Ward V.: How provider attitudes towards abortion can impact the quality of and access to abortion services: An assessment of IPPF/WHR provider Knowledge, Attitude and practice in six Latin America and Caribbean countries, 2004.
Solmaz Shotorbani, Fredericks Zimmerman, Janice F.Bell, Deborh Ward and Nassim Assefi: Attitudes and Intentions of future health providers towards Abortion provision: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2004:36(2):58-63.
Gebreselassie H., Fetters T., Singh S. Abdella A, Gebrhiwot Y, Tesfaye S Geressu T, Kumbi S. Caring for Women with abortion complications in Ethiopia: national estimates and future implications. Int. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010; 36(1):6-15.
Mitchell EM, Trueman KA, Gabriel MC, Fine A, Manentsa N,: Accelerating the Pace of Progress in South Africa: An Evaluation of the Impact of Values Clarification workshops on Termination of Pregnancy Access in Limpopo Province Chapel Hill, NC: 2005 Ipas.
Ipas, Abortion and human right in Sub-Saharan Africa, Initiatives in Reproductive Health Policy, 2000: 3 (2), Ipas
Penal Code of the Empire of Ethiopia, Proclamation Number 158 of 1957 (Negarit Gazeta Extraordinary issue number 1 of 1957). The Ethiopia Empire Government, 1957: 277.
Ipas, http://www.ipas.org/countries/Ethiopia.aspx (June 2008).
Ethiopia, Proclamation Number 414/2004, Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Article 551 (2004).
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia – Ministry of Health. Technical and Procedural Guidelines for Safe Abortion Service in Ethiopia, 2006 Addis Ababa.
Ethiopian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KAP study on abortion among Ethiopian health workers: 2002 (unpublished).
Central Statistical Authority. Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2007.
UNFPA, Programm of Action, Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development: Cairo, 1994.
Bongartes, John: Trends in unwanted childbearing in the developing world: Studies in Family Planning, 1997: 28(4): 267-272.
World Bank, the Millennium Development Goals for Health:
Rising to the Challenge, Washington D.C, 2004.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.






