Effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic radiation on pregnancy outcome: A meta-analysis

Fangfang Zhou, Chunlan Ma, Yu Jun Li, Miao Zhang, Wenna Liu

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic radiation (ELF-EMF) are generated by electrical devices and power systems (1 to 300 Hz). Although several studies have demonstrated that ELF-EMF may beassociated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, other studies have shown no evidence of associations. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic radiation on pregnancy outcomes. The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane library, Embase, EBSCO. In addition, the manual retrieval of relevant references was conducted as a supplement. Select all eligible studies published from Database construction library to March 10, 2021. Search type for queue research on influence of electromagnetic field radiation on pregnancy results. Data were screened and extracted independently by two researchers. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. There was no significant increase in the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects and preterm delivery in the pregnant women who lived near the electromagnetic fields compared with the control group. Conclusions: No correlation has been found between maternal ELF-EMF exposure and miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal birth defects and preterm delivery, while the effects on small gestational age and low birth weight are still uncertain. Related research with high-quality large samples and different regions are still needed for further verification. (Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27 [5]: 95-104).

Full Text:

PDF

References

Karimi A, Moghaddam FG and Valipour M. Insights in the biology of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields exposure on human health[J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2020, 47(7):5621-5633.

Migault L, Garlantezec R, Piel C, Martin LM, Orazio S, Cheminat M, Zaros C, Carles C, Cardis E, Ancel P, Charles M, Seze R, Baldi I and Bouvier G. Maternal cumulative exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, prematurity and small for gestational age: a pooled analysis of two birth cohorts[J]. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2020, 77(1):22-31.

Ingle ME, Minguez-Alarcon L, Lewis RC, Williams PL, Ford JB, Dadd R, Hauser R, Meeker JD and Team ES. Association of personal exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment in a longitudinal cohort study[J]. Fertility and Sterility, 2020, 114(5):1058-1066.

Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, Baker P, Smith E and Buchbinder R. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(9):934-9.

Wang R, Yan W, Du M, Tao L and Liu J. The effect of influenza virus infection on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2021, 105:567-578.

Liu Y and Cai Q. Does Cataract Surgery Improve the Progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration? A Meta-Analysis[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2020, 2020:7863987.

Robert E. Birth defects and high voltage power lines: an exploratory study based on registry data[J]. Reproductive Toxicology, 1993, 7(3):283-287.

Mahram M and Ghazavi M. The effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on pregnancy and fetal growth, and development[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2013, 16(4):221-4.

Blaasaas KG, Tynes T and Lie RT. Risk of selected birth defects by maternal residence close to power lines during pregnancy[J]. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2004, 61(2):174-176.

Auger N, Arbour L, Luo W, Lee GE, Bilodeau-Bertrand M and Kosatsky T. Maternal proximity to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and risk of birth defects[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2019, 34(7):689-697.

De Vocht F, Hannam K, Baker P and Agius R. MaternalResidential Proximity to Sourcesof Extremely LowFrequency Electromagnetic FieldsandAdverseBirthOutcomesina UKCohort[J]. Bioelectromagnetics, 2014, 35(3):201-209.

Auger N, Park AL, Yacouba S, Goneau M and Zayed J. Stillbirth and residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Occupational and environmental medicine, 2012, 69(2):147-149.

Zhou et al. Low-frequency electromagnetic radiation on pregnancy outcome

African Journal of Reproductive Health May 2023; 27 (5): 104

Wang Q, Cao Z, Qu Y, Peng X, Guo S and Chen L. Residential exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and the association with miscarriage risk: a 2-year prospective cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12):e82113.

Habash M, Gogna P, Krewski D and Habash RWY. Scoping Review of the Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields[J]. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 2019, 47(4):323-347.

Sadeghi T, Ahmadi A, Javadian M, Gholamian SA, Delavar MA, Esmailzadeh S, Ahmadi B and Hadighi

MSH. Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead Power Lines: a case-control study[J]. Rom J Intern Med, 2017, 55(3):145-150.

Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, Kundi M, Moshammer H, Lercher P, Müller K, Oberfeld G, Ohnsorge P, Pelzmann P, Scheingraber C and Thill R. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses[J]. Rev Environ Health, 2016, 31(3):363-397.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.