Closing the Gap between People and Programs: Lessons from Implementation of Social Accountability for Family Planning and Reproductive Health in Uganda

Vicky Boydell, Stella Neema, Kelsey Wright, Karen Hardee

Abstract

Globally, women‘s access to modern contraception can be attributed to poor service conditions and care. Growing evidence from across the health sector has found that social accountability approaches have the potential to improve the quality of care and therefore the utilization of health services, little of this evidence relates to family planning and reproductive health programs. This paper therefore assessed the results of retrospective implementation research into a five-year social accountability project in Uganda that focused on family planning and reproductive health.A mix of methods was used examine the project‘s implementation in three districts in Uganda between 2009 to 2013, including political economy analysis, document review, and in-depth interviews. Interviews were coded using ATLAS.ti software and analyzed with a thematic framework, organized by stakeholder groups and across districts. The research found that while the project broadly delivered as intended in local accounts, a wider range of activities and outcomes also occurred. Community participants in the three districts were much more likely to remember more personal changes, such as increased confidence when interacting with health care providers, in their health seeking behavior or in their ability to represent themselves. The research revealed a web of accountability relationships at play. These ranged from formal opportunities for community participation in institutional processes, to the more personal direct relationship between the service users and the health care provider compared to the less direct relationship between the community and local officials. In addition, ways in which elements of social accountability can be combined with features of FP program were seen, such as including outreach activities with civic and rights education. This appears to extend the reach and credibility of these services among community members while also counteracting barriers to women‘s and young people‘s participation. (Afr J Reprod Health 2018; 22[1]: 73-84).

References

Sedgh G, Ashford L and Hussain R. Unmet need for contraception in developing countries: examining women‘s reasons for not using a method. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2016. 2. FP2020. Momentum at the Midpoint 2015–2016. Annual Report. Washington DC: FP2020, 2016. 3. Castle S and Askew I. Contraceptive discontinuation: reasons, challenges and solutions. Washington DC: FP2020 report, 2015. 4. Brinkerhoff D. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy and Planning 2004; 19(6): 371-379. 5. George A. Using Accountability to Improve Reproductive Healthcare. Reproductive Health Matters 2003. 11(21):161–170. 6. Hilber A, Martin H, Blake H, Bohle L,Bandali S and Hulton L. Strengthening accountability for improved maternal and newborn health: A mapping of studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2016; 135: 345-357. 7. Gullo S, Galavotti C and Altman L. A review of CARE‘s Community Score Card experience and evidence. Health Policy and Planning 2016: 31:1467–1478. 8. Blake C, Annorbah-Sarpei N A, Bailey C, Ismaila Y, Deganus S, Bosomprah S, Galli F andClark S. Scorecards and social accountability for improved maternal and newborn health services: A pilot in the Ashanti and Volta regions of Ghana. International Journal of Gynecology& Obstetrics 2016: 135(3):372-379. 9. Schedler A. Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler A (ed) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. London: Lynne Reinner, 1999. 10. Ringold D, Holla A andKoziol M. Citizens and Service Delivery: Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in Human Development. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012. 11. Boydell V, Keesbury J and Wright K. Strengthening the Evidence Base on Social Accountability for Improving Family Planning and Reproductive Health Programs. Meeting Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2014. 12. Björkman M andSvensson J. Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009:124(2):735-769. 13. McGee R andGaventa J. Synthesis report: Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. London: Open Society Foundation, 2010. 14. Boydell V andKeesbury J. Social Accountability: What are the Lessons for Improving Family Planning and Reproductive Health Programs? A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2014. 15. King, S. Increasing the Power of the Poor? NGO-led Social Accountability Initiatives and Political Capabilities in Rural Uganda. European Journal of Development Research, 2015: 1-16. 16. Apunyo A, Healthy Action End of Project Evaluation Report. Berlin: DSW, 2016. 17. Gullo S, Galavotti C, Sebert Kuhlmann A, Msiska T, Hastings P and Marti CN. Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE‘s Community Score Card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled evaluation. PLoS ONE, 2017:12(2): e0171316.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.